E-Newsletter
Top Crop Manager
Subscription Centre
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
MARKETPLACE
Equipment Review
Job Board
Reader Card
Classifieds
 
COMMUNITY
Web Editorial
Top Crop Interactive
Events
Weather
 
RESOURCES
E-Newsletter
Industry Suppliers
Links
Sitemap
Resource Guides 2011
 
picture_7
 


Ballasting for better tractor efficiency

Weigh in on ballasting.*

Written by   
Weighting a tractor for optimum efficiency means improved pulling performance, less fuel consumption, and longer drive-train life. Yet, for many farmers, ballasting remains a once per tractor-lifetime scenario.
Weighting a tractor for optimum efficiency means improved pulling performance, less fuel consumption, and longer drive-train life. Yet, for many farmers, ballasting remains a once per tractor-lifetime scenario.

WTCM-20-18--ballast-2
 
A properly ballasted tractor uses less fuel, lasts longer and improves tractor efficiency. (Photos by Bruce Barker)
 
WTCM-20-18--front-ballast
 
A mechanical front-wheel drive (MFWD) tractor should have weight distributed 40 percent on front and 60 percent on back.

 
“For most folks, if the tractor ballast is looked at, it happens once at the dealer,” says Roger Hoy, director of the Nebraska Tractor Test Lab at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln.

Hoy explains that, ideally, a tractor’s ballast should be adjusted for each field operation, but he also knows that may be impractical. As a result, Hoy suggests ballasting for the most common field operation. For many western Canadian farms, that likely means tillage and seeding activities, especially for high- horsepower tractors. 

Lawrence Papworth, an engineer with the AgTech Centre at Lethbridge, Alberta, explains that the primary reason to assess a tractor’s ballast is to control wheel slippage. Over-ballasting, which is the most common, results in higher fuel consumption, sluggish tractor handling, and premature drive-train problems. Over-ballasted tractor tires show very little wear because they are not slipping in the soil.

An under-ballasted tractor will show excessive tire tread wear due to excessive slip, and cannot deliver full horsepower to the drawbar. Fuel is also wasted because of the excessive wheel slippage. 

A rough guideline for wheel slippage is 10 to 15 percent for two-wheel drive (2WD) tractors, and eight to 12 percent for four-wheel drive (4WD) tractors. Papworth explains that these slippage guidelines provide the most economical operating point where fuel consumption, tire life, productivity and tractor durability are combined.

Estimate slippage
Slippage is relatively easy to measure in the field. The AgTech Centre provides this guideline for measuring slippage.

Mark the side of a drive tire with a vertical chalk line. Under normal working conditions and on untilled ground, get the tractor and tillage implement up to speed. Have a helper drop a flag beside the tire when the chalk mark touches the ground. On the tenth tire revolution, drop another flag on the ground when the chalk mark hits the ground. 

Next, take the implement out of the ground, turn around, and drive back alongside the tilled ground with the implement out of the ground. Using the chalk mark as a guide, count the number of revolutions that it takes for the tractor to cover the same distance while keeping the tillage unit out of the ground. 

Use the following equation to estimate slippage: 

Percent slip = 10 minus the number of revolutions without load, divide by 10 and multiply by 100.

For example, if it took 8.75 revolutions with no load to cover the same distance as 10 revolutions under load, the slippage would be 12.5 percent (10 – 8.75 divided by 10 multiplied by 100).

If the tractor is a 4WD or front-wheel assist, do the same thing on the front drive wheels to ensure slip is evenly balanced.

If wheel slip falls within range, the tractor is ballasted correctly for the field operation. If it does not, consider changing the ballasting.

Ballasting tips
Ideally, ballast could be changed for each type of field operation, but that may be impractical, especially if calcium chloride is used in the tires for ballast. However, many tractors now primarily use cast iron ballast, which can be more easily added or taken off. Papworth says that many of the high-horsepower tractors are much heavier than in the past, so ballasting is more of a fine-tuning process to manage slippage.

Preliminary estimates for ballasting can be made based on horsepower and travel speed. AgTech information indicates that, generally, higher travel speeds require less ballast. The AgTech publication, Ballasting Your Tractor for Performance, explains that “the mechanical properties of the soil only allow so much deformation (slip) to occur in a given period of time. For example, a faster rolling tire has less time to cause deformation on a given area of soil; slip is reduced, and less ballast is required.”

Papworth explains that at slower speeds, more ballast is required to transfer most of the tractor’s horsepower to the ground.

The AgTech publication explains that 95 to 110 lbs per engine horsepower (79 kg/kW) is a rough starting point for estimating ideal tractor weight including ballast at a speed of eight kilometres per hour. The manufacturer’s recommendation on ballasting should also be consulted. This estimate should provide a slip percentage somewhere in the correct range when the tractor is fully loaded. But be aware of the effect of different speeds: to get the same slip percentage at 6.5 kilometres per hour requires 163 lbs per horsepower (99 kg/kW) for proper ballast; at 9.5 kilometres per hour, only 108 lbs per horsepower (66 kg/kW) is required.

This guideline should be compared to the actual weight of a tractor. The Nebraska Test reports also list the weights of unballasted tractors. Growers can usually get a tractor’s shipping weight, complete with additional equipment, from a dealer. A grain elevator scale is a good way to check the actual weight if it is convenient.

Weight distribution between the front and back wheels also should not be overlooked, says Papworth. The tractor type is important. 

Weight distribution for different tractor types
Type  Front
 Back
2WD 25%
75%
MFWD
40%
60%
4WD
55%
45%

Papworth says that over-ballasting is usually a more common problem, because farmers are trying to squeeze out all the horsepower they can from their tractor to pull large loads.

Another important point is to ensure tire inflation is correct. Papworth says that once the proper ballast weight and distribution is set, the tire pressure should be set for the corresponding weight on each tire.  Check the manufacturer recommendations for the weight carried by the tires.

During the summer of 2010, AgTech in co-ordination with the Agricultural Research and Extension Council of Alberta (ARECA) plans on holding several ballasting demonstration throughout the province. Check the ARECA website (www.areca.ab.ca) for further information.

*This article was provided by Alberta Research and Extension Council of Alberta, with information compiled from the AgTech Centre Research Update #725.
 
text size   A A A A